Follow iwantapounddog on Twitter

Jack Russell Terrier. Severe puncture wounds, likely from dog bites. Dislocated front canine. Called in as a stray.


Now at Toronto Animal Services South. Stitched up, drainage tubes sticking out all over, on pain meds and antibiotics.

I dropped by TAS to visit him. He was shivering in his kennel. Maybe it was my imagination but I think he shivered even harder whenever the dog two kennels over barked for my attention. When I brought him outside, he was still shaking, very uncertain, wouldn't give me any eye contact. It took 10 - 15 minutes before he trusted me enough to approach me and even then I could still feel little tremors going through him.



Shamus is a very keen Boxer Pointer mix who is highly motivated especially when it comes to food. I don't see him on the TAS site anymore so I think he may already have been adopted.




For adoption information on this dog and other dogs (and cats and other animals), please visit Toronto Animal Services.



Best guess is that Harley is a Labrador Staffordshire Terrier mix. And he's ten years old. He's a mellow old guy but if you meet him, you can tell he's still got a lot of vitality and there's certainly a sparkle in his eyes.

There's no doubt that these dogs with the biggest smiles are a dying breed in Ontario. I see less and less of them every year. Shame.





For adoption information on this dog and other dogs (and cats and other animals), please visit Toronto Animal Services.



Back in January this year, Toronto Animal Services South took in some Labradoodle pups from a puppy mill. They were timid and frightened when they first arrived but warmed up to people pretty quickly and were adopted out shortly after.

Here's an update on Griffin, one of the male pups. This is a photo of him when he was still at TAS:

(More photos here.)

And here's his recent photo:


He's all shaggy now and grown up into a tall teenager but I love how you can still see the resemblance.

From his new owner:

We adopted Griffin, lab poodle cross, back in February, thought you might want to see how he is. He is a great dog , gentle and fun with the kids, we are so pleased with him.



I don't think I met Oscar. Must've got adopted out before I had a chance to take his photo. Too bad. This guy has got a seriously cute mug.

From his new owners:




We came in and saw you at the EX on Sunday. I was telling you about how thrilled we are with our little puppy and you had asked me to send you some photos. Well, we had enrolled our little Oscar in puppy school at Pet Smart and last night was the graduation so I thought I'd send you the photos we took. There are quite a few here including photos of other puppies in the class. Ours was the only rescue dog but there were really some beautiful puppies in the class so I thought I may as well send you all of the pics. I hope you like them!

Thanks again for our puppy. We're over the moon with him. Whoever fostered him did a wonderful job too. :)



Two very nice update letters from the new owners of Francis:


July 12, 2011

Hi All

Remember me, I just want to let you all know I'm very happy. You were all very good to me but it was time to move on, I didn't want to wear out my welcome.

I arrived to my forever home yesterday at around 2 pm. My new parents gave me a warm bath and they even had a special white towel with black doggies on it (talk about feeling special). Then my new Dad took me for a long walk. When I arrived back home Mom had a special meal for me lean beef and veggies over kibbles (yummie). Then they took me swimming, not sure if I liked it but it made them very happy. We then played fetch we all got very tired so we just crashed out by the pool for a nap. Then I had to go for another walk. I really think my Dad was trying to show me off but nobody was around. We then came home and watched TV. Dad was into the All Star game and Mom was watching the Bachelorette - boring.

I have two doggie beds one downstairs and one upstairs but being new I wanted to sleep with my Parents and that was Okay with them. Mom says I snore but so what ... so does she.

Morning came and we had breakfast and then off to the Vets. My new Doctor is Dr. Chris Martin and guess what she loves me too, she thinks I'm smart, cute, well behaved and sooooooooooooo precious. I think she is all that too.

Then we were off to get my licence. I'm now officially a Stoney Creek Resident. It's a lot quieter here but I'll get use to it.

Well I should go now I see my white towel out I guess that means I have to try this swimming thing again, anything to make them happy.

Don't worry about me anymore I know they love me soooo much and the feeling is mutual, I will be just fine.

My Mommy said I can keep in touch with all of you and you can come and see me if you are down this way, just bring your bathing suits because I'm sure they will try and put you into the pool also.

Thanks for finding me my forever home (I Love It) Please do your best for all my buddies I left behind.

Bye for now
Love you lots
Frankie


September 8, 2011

It's just me Frankie. I know you might have forgotten about me, but I still think about all of you.

I have been so busy since arriving at my new home. It seems the summer just flew by. I've been up to Huntsville, Bracebridge, Niagara on the Lake and Perry Sound. Last weekend I went to a baseball tournament in Niagara Falls and then we even went to the United States of America just to shop. The customs lady thought I was so cute and said she could even take me home. Thank goodness she didn't.

My parents said this is nothing Frankie wait till you see Florida next year. Can't wait ...

We had a pool party too, and I met all my Mom and Dad's friends they all thought I was great. They were all very nice too.

I now can find my way out of the pool, my parents taught me how to climb up the stairs, still not to keen on swimming, but they insist that I go in with them.

One evening a little black and white creature came on my property. I wanted him to leave so I chased him. I smelled awful after that. I ran so fast and right into my Mom and Dad's bed. That didn't go over to good. I promised my parents that I wouldn't bother with that guy again. He better stay away so I won't get into any more trouble.

I hope you all are doing well, please don't worry about me. I'm having the time of my life. You couldn't have found me a better home. We are so happy together.

Love Frankie



(fiction)

I have my dogs by my side and they will follow me without question, without doubt or hesitation until our end which may be tomorrow or the day after, which may be while we are sleeping or watching TV. You just never know.

I trust my dogs without question, without doubt or hesitation. I trust my dogs like no other.

I stand with them in front of the building in which I live. I have a room on the second floor beside the stairs. It is not a fancy building. It is not a building for fancy people. I can hear the footsteps of the other tenants as they climb up and down but I do not mind. Their footsteps and voices do not bother me. The other tenants do not bother me. They see my dogs. They know my dogs. They know I trust my dogs like no other.

My building is three floors with eight rooms per floor. It is one of six buildings which are red brick veneer over cinder block and flat tar rooftops and rusty, shaky balcony railings and small aluminum framed windows and these buildings are set in two rows of three spread equally over a city block and this city block is repeated a dozen times in a matrix of three by four and there are no libraries, parks or bus stops, no hospitals, stores or schools. There is nothing to disrupt the steady thrum of ventilation equipment and the sound of tires on the road. There is nothing to disrupt my balance.

Here I am with my dogs in front of my building but there is more. There is the parking lot. There is the sandbox. There is the cell phone tower. And nature, too, is in abundance. Why here comes the bluish sky. Here comes the yellowish sun.

In the courtyard, two of them are lying on their pink lawn-chairs in their bikinis, reading romance novels, soaking up the rays as they say. They are pretty women. Everyone talks about them, about the clothes they shared, the songs they sang to each other. They have not done that in a while. Now they just mostly tan. It cannot be that healthy but what do I know about current fashion trends? The women are young. They do what they need to do to succeed in life. Who am I to judge but I remember them when they were still pale. I much preferred them that way.

It has not rained in sixty seven days. It is so dry and hot now that if you take a piss, it will evaporate before it hits the ground, or so they say. Ha ha. I do not know. I am not the kind of man who pisses outdoors. That would be immoral and God does not like an immoral man. My dogs piss outdoors but they are soulless so it does not matter and now their piss wets the dirt where once it burned the grass but I am not worried about the weather even though it has not rained in three hundred and twenty eight days. I have my air conditioning units and my tap water. I do not need your weather. I do not believe in your weather. Your weather is a lie and a conspiracy. If it does not rain for eight hundred and sixty four days, why should I worry? If it does not rain for one thousand four hundred twenty three days, why should I worry?

So do not talk to me about your weather. I am tired of hearing about your weather. I do not care about your weather and I do not trust it.

Here is my list:

I trust my dogs. I do not trust your politicians. I trust my dogs. I do not trust your police. I trust my dogs. I do not trust your lawyers. I trust my dogs. I do not trust your scientists. I trust my dogs. I do not trust your teachers. I trust my dogs. I do not trust your children. I trust my dogs. I do not trust your ...

Here comes a man now. Here comes a man with long fine fingers and small pebble eyes. He will be my friend until he becomes my enemy. He holds out his right hand for a shake but it is clenched like a fist. In his left hand is meat.

The dogs sit.

"How ya doin', Bud?" he asks.

"Not bad," I say.

"Good, good," he says.

"Yes," I say.

"Nice dogs," he says but does not unclench his fists, does not offer them any of his meat.

The man bends over, looks down at my dogs. His smile is full of teeth and nothing else. His ears lay flat against his head. I can hardly see them. They are very smooth against his head.

"Nice dogs," he says again. "What's their breeding?"

"They are both Americans," I say.

"Good, good," the man says. "Americans ... good stock?"

"Only the best," I say.

"Pure?" he asks.

"Only the purest," I say.

"Good, good," he says.

The man is sweating in his dark blue suit. Sweat shines like baby oil on top of his nearly bald head. Each short strand of his stubble cut hair is glistening. He is sweating so much, I can see sweat flowing out from his pores, each bead pushed out like a bubble from beneath the skin. The sweat flows down and pools at the upper edge of a deep thick furrow on his forehead. It pools until the bead gets too large and the surface tension breaks and the rivulet runs down the furrow towards the left, my left, and travels over his brow, just about clears the brow but hits a large dark pink protuberance in the skin and is diverted downwards. The rivulet gathers speed as it descends, enough speed to clear the eyebrow and it lands on the eyelid. The man feels this and blinks but the blink does not stop the descent and instead adds energy to it and the stream of sweat hits the eyelashes, is sliced by the eyelashes and flies in all different directions.

He says, "Hey if you don't mind me asking cuz I am new round here and all but what's with those chicks out there?"

He points over at the sunbathers. I look over to them to see if they have overheard his question but I do not think they have. At least they have not reacted. At least they have not moved. I cannot remember the last time I have seen them move.

"They are ..." I begin and he waits for me to finish but I do not know what to say.

Then, "How long they been out there?" he asks.

I do not know what to say.

"I mean, they look over done. You know what I mean? It's like they're ... I mean, are they really old or ...?" he asks.

I look over at them, at the sun's work: dark brown, almost black skin, shriveled and shrink wrapped around bone. Their feet look clenched. Their fingers look brittle. Their mouths are open but they are quiet. I cannot remember the last time they spoke. Not a whisper. Not a sound. Books in their hands, pages unturned. Dry plastic party cups on the ground beside them. Eyes unblinking, staring into the sky. I cannot remember the last time they moved. How do they do that, remain so still. How long has it been? Unmoving, unbreathing, unliving. But their hair looks great so how could he possibly think they are old?

"... or are they sorta just dead?" he asks.

Still, I do not know what to say.

The man is sweating in his dark blue suit and he rubs the sweat out of his eyes with his elegant hands.

"Cuz if they're dead, someone should think about calling disposal," he says.



The dogs and I eat the same meal most nights. We are creatures of routine if nothing else. There is comfort in routine. Safety. Some people say nothing new, nothing gained. I say nothing new, nothing lost. There is much to lose these days, much to protect against from the pilfering of others. They will nickel and dime you to death, they say. You give a man an inch, he will take a mile, they say and I believe it. You give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. You teach a man to fish and he will fish the oceans dry. Not that I care. I do not eat fish but you know what I mean. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing and more knowledge is a catastrophe.

We eat the same meal most nights but tonight we have something special. I scoop out some of the ground meat from the plastic bag and put it in the fry pan. I put the pan on the stove. I turn the heat on. I watch it as it sizzles. The dogs sit beside me, waiting. One dog lies down but sits up again every time I make a move towards the pan.

When the meat is almost done, I throw in some rice, some carrots, some lettuce, a beef flavoured soup cube. I turn the heat down, wait another ten minutes and that is enough. I do not need to look at it to see if it is cooked. I know by heart now how long it takes. I know by heart now what it tastes like.

After dinner is finished, I take the dogs for a walk.

The man sweating in the blue suit is standing in front of my building when I return from my walk. I do not know what he is doing there but he waves at me so I stop.

"Hey, I called about those two women out there," he says.

"Oh yes," I say. "The women."

"Yeah," he says. "I called the number but when the guys came, they said the women were gone."

"Huh," I say.

"Yeah, exactly," he says.

"Huh," I say.

"You don't happen to know what happened to them do you?"

"No, I do not think so," I say.

"Funny thing all that," he says.

"Yes," I say. "Funny."

Over in the courtyard, the lawn chairs are still there but one is turned over. The plastic cups, the books still there on the ground. The women are gone.



There are days when I walk through my life and it feels like I have barely a hold left on reality. I do not know where it has gone, into hiding or perhaps just away, like when you throw something away, flush something away, that kind of away, hidden by a garbage bag or plastic plumbing, not away at all, just out of sight where I can choose not to see it.

TV talks about this sense of detachment all the time now, this new equilibrium most likely brought on by liberal attitudes and behaviours. They say it spreads, that it is like another disease going around with no vaccine to treat it.

I am sure you have heard these same sentiments a thousand times before from a thousand different people, from freeloading unionists, soft headed journalists and fatherless children - the usual complainers. You might be mistaking me for one of them so I can understand if you are embarrassed by these pitiful revelations about myself but I can assure you I am not one of them. This is unlike me. This is a passing phase, I am fairly certain.

So you understand it is hard for me to say this, but I must in order to explain everything clearly to you so that you understand, that some days I am at the point where I would rather not live reality, rather I could wish it onto a screen and pretend it is just a movie I have paid money to see and from which I can exit at any time.

The only thing that saves me now is my dogs. Without my dogs, I would have killed myself a long time ago. Without my dogs, I would kill myself now. Srsly, LOL, as they say.

This is the wrong attitude, obviously. This is not a success oriented attitude. I could never be a restaurant worker or retail sales person with this attitude. I realize with this attitude, I will never have good career prospects or good job security.

With this attitude, I could be a threat.

The next time I see the man, he asks me, "What you say your dogs were?"

"Americans," I say.

"Oh yeah, I remember now," he says. "Good lineage, right?"

"Yes," I say.

"I had some European dogs a few years back," the man says. "Not worth shit."

"No," I say.

"All those fancy breeds, look fancy, cost fancy but not worth shit," he says. "I shoulda just stuck with good ol' American dogs."

"Good old American dogs," I say.

The man takes a piece of meat out of his pocket and raises it to his mouth.

My dogs sit.

He bites into the meat with his back molars. He tears a piece off with a jerk of his thick neck. A smear of bloody grease coats his lips. A slow tongue wipe and it is gone.

He watches the dogs as he chews. My dogs watch his actions with interest.

The man takes another bite of meat and chews. And chews and chews. Finally, he spits it out. My dogs look at the gray masticated meat on the ground.

"On me," the man says.

"Okay," I say and loosen the leash and both dogs lunge for the meat. There is a quick snarl and a snap and the boy backs off and the girl eats.

"Spirited," says the man. "I like that. You ever put them in the ring?"

"No," I say.

"Shame," the man says. "Could make some good money for you. The kind of money taxes'll never touch."

"They are not old enough yet," I say.

"No?" he asks.

"No," I say.

"Funny, they look old enough to me," he says. "You know the thing is with many of these Americans nowadays is their breed's corrupted. Too much cross pollinating with too many foreign bitches. The younger generation's all fucked up in the blood. Can hardly identify them sometimes. Creates problems. You know what I'm talking about, right?"

I have seen the list. I have read about the problems.

"Problems with behaviour. Problems with attitude. Problems with intelligence. Problems with respect," the man says.

"Lots of problems the rest of us have to deal with," he says. "Problems with aggression. Problems with eating habits. Problems with their smell. Problems with drugs. Problems with religion. Problems with respect for their bosses. Problems with work ethic. Problems with responsible parenting. Problems with gangs. Problems with unnaturally high sex drives. Problems with respect for authority."

"I have read the reports," I say.

"But that's not your dogs, of course," he says. "Right?"

"My dogs are fine," I say.

"So you say," the man says. "I can tell just by looking at them." He looks at them. "They're perfect specimens of their breed."



People say the species which will be the most successful are the ones which are parasites to humans. We cover the planet and the parasites come along for the ride. Crows, rats, cockroaches. Where ever we go, they go. Dogs are on that list too.

Dogs are funny that way. They do not care who you are, they still like you. Unless you beat them within an inch of their lives, they will like you and even then, sometimes when you do beat them within an inch of their lives, they still like you. I am not saying I do that to my dogs. I would never do that to my dogs. I would never beat them unnecessarily.

Dogs do not discriminate. They do not care if you are some liberal educated homosexual or some geriatric with hemorrhoids and a shotgun. For the most part, you will find a dog who will take to you.

I got my dogs seven years ago. I got them both at the same time. A boy came by with a bag, opened it up, puppies inside, asked me if I wanted one. I said no. Later, I saw him out back of Building 4 twisting their necks and throwing them into the garbage can. His mother was standing around smoking a cigarette. I did not know where she got the cigarette from.

"Somebody selling cigarettes round here?" I asked.

"No," she said.

"Where did you get the cigarettes?" I asked.

"Why? You want one?" she asked.

I just looked at her. I wanted one but I just looked at her.

She said, "You take a couple of these puppies off my hands and I'll give you a whole pack. How's about that? I am tired of listening to them squeal all afternoon. It's giving me a fucking migraine."

I took the cigarettes. I took two puppies. I did not feed them for a few days and I thought they would just die but they did not so I started looking after them. Now they look after me.




"You taking care of your dogs?" the man asks.

"Yes," I say.

"They eating well?" he asks.

"Yes," I say.

"How you affording to feed them?" he asks me.

"I work in a restaurant," I tell him. "Table scraps."

"Smart man," he says and smiles. "Like Jesus said, waste not, want not."

"Wise words," I say.

"Wise words indeed," the man says. The man runs his hand from the top of his forehead through his meagre hair and back then shakes the gathered sweat off his hand.

"You ever think about selling one of your dogs?" he asks.

"No," I say.

"If you were thinking about selling your dogs, how much?" he asks.

"Never thought about it," I say but I think about it now then put it out of my mind.



I am standing in front of my building with my dogs and the sky is clear and the sun is clear. There is a crack in the earth from my feet past the lawn chairs to the other side of the courtyard. Every day the crack grows a little longer and a little wider. People are saying to be careful around it. People say that someone has already sprained an ankle.

The man sweating in the blue suit walks along one side of the crack. He walks in a straight line, unwavering, uncompromising despite the risk of stepping into an offshoot crack of the crack. There is someone walking beside him. The other man has a shaved head. He has medically enhanced muscles. I have seen the other man before with dogs, every time different dogs, short, squat things. They do not last long with him.

The two men walk up to me. The blue suit man nods at me but does not say anything to me. He points at my dogs. The other man looks at my dogs. He walks around them. He reaches out to touch them. The female snaps at him as a warning but the man does not draw his hand back. The blue suited man is impressed by this.

The male dog turns and looks slowly at the man's outstretched hand. The dog is very still and I can see the whites of his eyes. The man sees this too. He hesitates. I know the male will not miss if he snaps. Perhaps the man knows this too. He takes his hand back.

The two men nod at each other and then they leave the same way they came.



In the afternoon, the man in the blue suit comes back.

"Have you thought about a price for your dogs?" he asks.

"No," I say.


The next day, the man in the blue suit comes back.

"How much for the dogs?"

"No," I say.


The next time the man in the blue suit comes back, he is holding a plastic bag. His muscular friend stands beside him and stares at me.

The blue suit man looks at me then at the dogs. He holds up the plastic bag and shakes it. He steps towards the dogs. The dogs watch him with interest. He takes another step towards them. I watch him with interest. He watches the dogs watching the bag. He lowers the bag.

"Keeping a dog must be a chore, taking care of them all the time. Taking them out every time they need to piss or crap. Feeding them. Keeping them healthy. Vet bills must be expensive," he says.

"I have never taken them to a vet," I say.

"Never been to a vet? How do you know they're healthy then?"

"They have never been sick," I say.

"Maybe they're sick and you just don't see it. Maybe it's one of those sicknesses that don't show up until it's too late. They might just drop dead on you one day." Then he turns to his friend, "That can happen right?"

"Yeah," says the muscular man.

"They are not sick," I say.

"And what about accidents? You know dogs get into all sorts of things. Getting into fights. Chasing cars. Picking things off the ground. Eating all sorts of things they shouldn't be eating."

I look at the man's shoes. They are covered in dust but the shine underneath still comes through. He must polish them quite often. I wonder what that must be like, to have the time and the desire to polish one's shoes.

"You know my friend here was just telling me he has this rat problem. So he buys this poison to poison them. It stops blood from coagulating or something like and the rats bleed to death on the inside. I don't get it. How do you bleed to death on the inside? I mean isn't inside where all your blood is supposed to be? Anyway, he says the stuff works really well." Then, to his friend, "Right?"

"Yeah," the muscular man says.

"So you just mix it up with some raw hamburger, right? And put it out at night?" the blue suited man asks.

"Yeah," the muscular man says.

"Usually, he picks the stuff up in the morning so his dogs don't eat it but one time he missed some and this young bitch he had must've eaten it. At least that's what he figured cause when he found her, she was on her side and couldn't get up." Then to his friend, "And what else?"

"Blood was leaking out her ass," the muscular man says.

"Right, blood was leaking out her ass," the blue suit man says.

"Then she died," the muscular man says.

"Point being, the shit works," the blue suit man says then he pulls something out of the plastic bag. Raw cubes of meat. He looks at me. He looks at the dogs. He tosses the meat and the cubes land at their feet.

The meat is too tempting. I know they will not listen to me. I try to hold them back but the male is too quick and his leash too loose. He snaps up a cube of the meat. I try to reach his mouth but I have to keep the female back away from the rest of the meat on the ground. By the time I get to him and pry his mouth open, he has already swallowed it.

"Hey, it's okay," the blue suit man says. "I was making some jerky last night and had some left over. I thought about your dogs. That's all. Thought I'd give 'em a treat."

I look at the male. I try to notice any change in his breathing, any excessive salivation.

"Don't worry," the man says. "That meat was fine. Grade A stuff. I should've saved some for you. You could've made some good stew out of it. Next time I see you, I'll bring over some of that jerky. You'll love it. Good and salty."

I crouch down. I run my hands over the male's chest to feel his heart beat, his lungs breathe.

"Like I said, it's all good," the man says. "But I understand why you're worried. You just never know what people'll leave lying around on the ground these days. There're some sick fucks out there. You wouldn't want your dogs picking something up while you're on a walk. They eat something nasty, they wouldn't be worth much then would they?"

The man looks at me and smiles. He reaches into the bag and pulls out another piece of meat and puts it in his mouth.

"See? It's all good," he says. "Why don't you take a couple of days and think about how much you'd like to sell your dogs for. For real this time. Last time I ask, okay?"

The men turn and start to walk away but then the blue suit man stops and turns around again.

"Look, you probably think I'm a bad person but I'm not. I just, well, I see a lot of potential in your dogs and I think you're doing both yourself and them a great disservice not letting them fulfill that potential. To be human is to recognize potential and to know when to seize it. It's all about capital and competition. Didn't anyone teach you that in church? That's what separates us from them," the man says and points at my dogs and then leaves.


I cannot sleep that night. I am puzzled. I spend all night going over the conversation. I try to understand what the blue suited man said to me. I feel he has given away a secret. I just need to decode it and it will change everything. I spin the words over in my mind. I recite them. I write them down. I rewrite them and the more I do this, the more I feel their meaning exposed. I do not sleep at all but by morning I am finally there and I understand: capital and competition. It explains everything.

If things were different, if people were different, maybe we would all have reached a higher plateau but we are not different. We are what we are and what more can we expect of ourselves? Capital and competition - it is the way of the world and even if it takes us to the end of the world, what more can we expect of ourselves? I understand now and I am grateful to the man. He has taught me a wonderful thing because it explains everything.

A man with a car buys a bigger car. A man with a house buys a bigger house. A man with a gun buys a bigger gun. A man with nothing picks up the biggest rock he can throw. It's the way of the world.

Capital and competition - it explains me.



I leave my dogs inside the next time I go out.

When I see the blue suited man, he is alone and I invite him back to my apartment to talk about the dogs. At first he hesitates, but then says, "Sure, why the fuck not?"

We walk back to my building and walk upstairs to the second floor. As usual, the dogs sense my approach and start whimpering even before I open the door. When I open the door, the dogs push forward to greet me but then back up when they see the man come in behind me. I tell them it is okay. I tell them they can greet the man. I remind them he is the one who gives them the good snacks.

The man walks around my apartment. He touches things. He picks things up and looks at them. He walks over to the window and looks outside at the courtyard. He asks me if I have any beer and I do.

"No, I do not," I say.

I turn on the television for him and give him the remote.

"You really know how to make a guest feel welcome," the man says and chuckles at his own sarcasm. For a moment, I wonder if this too is a coded comment on my condition, an addendum to what he said yesterday but I realize it is not. It is only passive aggressive weakness but I am not disappointed in him. He is just the messenger. He does not embody the message.

I say to him, "Your words from yesterday. I understand."

"What are you talking about?" he asks.

I am grateful to the man but he is just the messenger. He does not understand his own message. And he is weak.

"Yesterday, what you said," and I take the hammer and I hit him in the head with it using the nail remover side. For a moment, it hangs there embedded in his skull and then it drops to the floor. The man looks at me like he wants to ask my permission for something and then he drops to the floor.

I have nothing to say.

The dogs sit.



When I first started volunteering at Toronto Animal Services South, the anti-Pit Bull law in Ontario was not on my radar. I had no previous dealings with Pit Bulls and I didn't know anyone who had a Pit Bull. I'd heard grumblings, mostly from big media organizations, about what evil dogs they were but didn't really pay them a lot of attention - no more than I would've paid attention to news about, for example, hurricanes in some other part of the world. Yeah, it was a problem but it wasn't my problem.

That's not to say the constant negative media stereotyping against Pit Bulls didn't affect me at all. It did. Also, though I never had any direct dealings with Pit Bulls, I'd seen a few of them in the neighbourhood pulling around their crack dealing/using owners and gangsta wannabes and that certainly coloured my impression of those dogs.

My attitude back then towards Pit Bulls wasn't o-my-god-save-me-from-those-jaws-of-death but if I was given a multiple choice on the level of comfort I'd have with a Pit Bull in my house, I'd probably have chosen c. Sleep with one eye open.

Stereotyping is a funny thing. On the one hand, it enables us humans to make snap decisions about stuff so we don't have to approach everything like we're perpetual babes in the woods with no life experiences to draw upon whatsoever. For instance, tomorrow, I'm going to go to work and assume all the people there, even the ones I've never met before, speak English. That assumption makes things a lot easier and more pleasant for everyone involved.

On the other hand, stereotyping can blind us to reality. So sure, I'd read all those news reports about Pit Bull attacks but somehow I'd forgotten that any breed of dog, in the wrong circumstances, can be dangerous as well. And sure, I'd seen the Pit Bulls belonging to the neighbourhood machismo-seeking dirtbags but I'd also seen Pit Bulls heeling nicely beside couples in their matching Mountain Equipment Co-op Goretex jackets. Why had I forgotten about them? Or rather, why had I discounted the well-heeled Pitties and instead given more negative weight to the untrained, spike collared dogs?

I was lazy, that's why. I let other people's hysteria tell me how I should think. Instead of trusting my own experiences and coming to my own conclusions, I was swayed by someone else' fear and hate.

Defending the lives of innocent Pit Bulls is not an excuse for dangerous dogs. I would no more want dangerous dogs in my neighbourhood than I would want dangerous people roaming those streets. Actually, no, that's not true. I'd much rather face down a crazy aggressive Pit Bull than a crazy aggressive human and I've seen more than enough of the latter and almost none of the former.

You're probably a million times more likely (maybe I should fact check this number) to be squashed by a car driven by a lawyer who used to be a close advisor to the premier than to be involved in a dangerous Pit Bull encounter and yet we don't ban car drivers or lawyers or politicians. We wouldn't even dare suggest it.

We encounter death, injury and suffering from any number of sources but it's always the marginalized groups, especially those who do not have a voice, who cannot defend themselves, who are stereotyped the worst, assigned vastly disproportionate blame and receive the most undeserved punishment.

Because of that stereotyping, too many Ontarians applauded when politicians enacted their morally corrupt anti-Pit Bull laws as a mindless distraction to the many more real and pressing problems facing our province. Those laws have lead to the killing of hundreds, if not thousands of innocent dogs in this province by municipal animal control agencies based on appearances alone. And hundreds more, many taken away from their loving families, have been exiled to other more humane provinces because staying here would have been a death sentence.

In my book, there is something terribly wrong with a person who would try to gain political advantage by stereotyping, scapegoating and punishing the innocent. Isn't that what scumbag dictators do?

The provincial elections are coming up in Ontario. I'm not going to say you should decide who to vote for based just on this single canine welfare issue - of course our government is about much more than this - but please at least consider the unfairness of the anti-Pit Bull law, and those who created it and still support it, when deciding who you will support.

I'm not suggesting who to vote for but if you live in, say, Parkdale-High Park and this issue sways you to vote for, say, Cheri Dinovo (who is trying to get rid of the anti-Pit Bull law) instead of the other candidates (whoever they are) then good.

The following is a repost from October 2008.


B had a bad record. Her owner let her off leash at a park and B started a dog fight. The owner was warned by city officials to keep B on leash and muzzled when in public.

Maybe the owner misunderstood the instructions because he brought B to another park and let her off leash where she got into another dog fight. This time B was taken away from the owner. The owner wanted B back but before that could happen, he had to once again promise to keep the dog on leash and muzzled. Once he agreed to this and because there were also extenuating circumstances leading to leniency on compassionate grounds (for the owner, not the dog), B was returned to him.

He then took B to a park and released her off leash. B got into another dog fight. B was once again taken away from the owner and placed in confinement at Toronto Animal Services South where she was due to be euthanized. Generally, unless there are other more egregious considerations, dogs who get into dog fights, especially ones who get into fights because of irresponsible owners, aren't automatically given a death sentence but because B was considered a Pit Bull type dog, a death sentence was what she got. B was the first dog to be "tried" in court under the anti-Pit Bull section of the Dog Owner's Liability Act (DOLA) and someone wanted to prove a point.

But again the owner wanted B back and decided to appeal the decision.

An appeal can be very drawn out and since it didn't cost the owner anything, he delayed the process as long as he could by not returning phone calls, not showing up for court appearances.

So, B was kept at TAS for over three years. Her owner never visited her. She had no visitors at all and, due to her legal situation, she was never allowed outside. She spent almost all her time locked in a 1 meter by 2 meter concrete kennel. Occasionally, one of the sympathetic staffers or volunteers would take her into one of the empty rooms in the facility and play with her for a few minutes but other than that, B was kept in isolation.

I didn't know any of this the first time I accidentally stumbled upon her. I walked into the wrong room trying to find a vet tech and instead I saw what looked to me like a big Staff Terrier wagging its tail and quietly looking up at me as I walked up to her kennel. She looked like a mass of muscle stuck on four spindly legs with a football for a head. When she saw I wasn't going to leave right away, she wagged her tail harder and her hind end wiggled like a puppy's. I extended my hand and she tried to nudge it with her nose through the mesh of her door. I patted her nose a bit and then turned away to leave. Usually, when a person walks away from a kenneled dog, the dog will bark hoping for more attention but she just looked at me and kept wagging her tail.

Later, I asked about the Staff Terrier and got B's history as stated in the above. I wanted to take some photos of her so I asked if I could be there when she was taken out of her kennel for her next exercise period.

She turned out to be a playful dog, very happy to have someone keeping her company. B proudly carried around her only toy, a squeaky ball, and dropped it at my feet and waited for me to kick it so she could fetch it again. She was full of pent up energy and the only time she stayed in one spot was when I scratched her back and then she happily wiggled her hind quarters. When her time was up, she obediently followed the staff member back into her cage and only gave a single cry of disappointment when her cage door was shut.

I had a hard time reconciling the behaviour of this dog with its living situation. If I were left in solitary confinement for months on end with nothing to do except stare at the walls and floor, I'd go crazy. I'm not sure, but I think that holds true for most warm blooded animals. The grace with which B handled her isolation truly amazed me. Not only did she not go cage crazy, she remained calm and friendly and her constantly happy wagging tail was a sure sign of her resilient personality.

The case dragged on until, finally, it was discovered that the owner had left town with no forwarding address and had basically abandoned B to the city. The staff at TAS tried to get the kill order reversed, saying that B was not a threat to people and would be sent to a Pit Bull rescue facility where she would be properly supervised and kept away from other dogs. For a while, there was hope. But in the end, with political pressure to adhere to the breed ban, the request was turned down.

On a cold afternoon in February, after spending the last three years of her life in solitary confinement, B was killed.



Photo from Crumpet's new owner:


I still think he looks like Bill the Cat.



(Letter to Rob Ford and city councillors from Joanne Singer.)

August 31, 2011

To: Mayor Rob Ford and all Councilors for the City of Toronto

Dear Mayor and Councillors:

Re: Proposed Privatization of Toronto Animal Services ("TAS")

I am a private citizen gravely concerned about the proposed service reductions through for-profit privatization relating to TAS and felt compelled to write this letter. I fervently hope that every one of you will take the time to read it. I know that this letter is lengthy but the for-profit privatization of animal care and control is not a decision to be made lightly and not without pertinent information and in-depth analysis. I have compiled some research that I think will be of interest to you. Toronto needs to get ahead of the curve with respect to animal care and control, not fall backwards.

I would like to begin by saying that I have adopted two wonderful animals from TAS that perhaps would not have had the opportunity to find a loving, permanent home had TAS not been actively involved in adoptions. Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that adoptions will continue under a privatized for-profit organization. As a matter of fact, there is no guarantee that anything beneficial to animals will continue under for-profit privatization. Logic dictates that it simply cannot when the bottom line is the dollar. It is far cheaper to kill an animal than invest time, money and resources in feeding, housing, vetting and adopting out that animal.

The KPMG Core Services Review ("CSR") sets out savings contemplated by privatization as Low (up to 5%) for both Cat and Dog Licensing and Enforcement and Animal By-Law Enforcement and Mobile Response and Medium (up to 20%) for Animal Sheltering and Adoption and Animal Care and Enforcement. Those are anticipated or potential amounts only and there is no conclusive proof that those will be actual savings.
One of the best approaches to cost savings and self-sustaining revenue generation with respect to animal care and control in Toronto is to study, liaise with and implement some of the proven strategies of Calgary Animal and By-Law Services under the direction of Bill Bruce.

The City of Calgary has approached the animal care and control situation by promoting responsible pet ownership and responsive animal services – not animal control and not building more shelters to fill. The Calgary model focuses on a positive change in human behaviour through education and compliance which leads to a positive outcome for animals. Bill Bruce has focused on the following in his model:

• Licensing and permanent identification promoting the idea that your pet's identification is its ticket home and which quickly reunites lost pets with their families. About 90% of the dogs and about 50,000 cats in Calgary now have licences; the majority of lost pets do not even enter the shelter, but are scanned by mobile humane officers and driven home. This is a great perquisite for animal owners and eliminates the cost of housing and feeding a lost pet. If an animal does enter the shelter, it is up on the shelter's lost and found webpage within 15 minutes of admission.

• Spay and neuter initiatives that reduce unwanted litters humanely. Every single cat and every neglected dog left to die on the streets is the sad result of an irresponsible owner with an unspayed animal.

• Providing information on proper medical care, socialization, training, diet and exercise which produces safe, healthy animals, prevents pets from becoming a nuisance and reduces community complaints and the attendant drain on resources in responding.

• This also includes implementing responsible pet ownership educational programs for school-age children. Also, animal abuse in early childhood is routinely the precursor of sexual, physical and domestic abuse in adulthood. These early education programs go a long way in teaching respect and compassion for animals which translates into caring, compassionate, empathetic adults. The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence conducted its own study in which 85.4 percent of women and 63 percent of children reported incidents of pet abuse after arriving at domestic violence shelters.

Calgary implemented mandatory cat licensing on January 1, 2007 with a grace period on fines to encourage owners to register their cats. Billboards announcing that there would be a zero tolerance for unlicensed dogs and cats with an accompanying fine in the range of $250 have resulted in a doubled return to owner rate and a huge reduction in their kill rate. All of Calgary's by-law fees and fines go directly toward helping animals with city-run programs such as adoption and emergency medical care for injured animals. Calgary Animal Services is also in the process of building its own spay/neuter clinic to provide free spay-neuters for low-income pet owners.

All of Calgary's animal services' funding is derived from licensing, independent fund-raising and fines: NOT TAX DOLLARS. Bill Bruce set out with the plan in mind to free animal services from dependence on an unpredictable and ever-changing tax base and is now in charge of the most successful animal services funding model in North America. Calgary Animal Services has an operating budget of about $5.4 million, of which 80 to 85 percent comes from licensing and the rest from adoption fees, impound fees, fines, and fund-raising. Heavy-handed enforcement for fines is a last resort and Calgarians have proudly bought into the collaborative model of responsible pet ownership and 85 percent now support this program.

Calgary has also made it easy for pet owners to obtain their licences by telephone, online, by mail, through a night depository box or flagging down a mobile humane officer. Reminder notices are sent out annually and follow up calls are made. The licensing fees are kept affordable by considering the consumer price index and the cost of living to determine an affordable rate so each year the fees are increasing, not decreasing.

Calgary is so progressive that they are in the process of setting up a pet morgue where dogs and cats killed on the city streets can be identified through their website in order to provide closure for distraught owners who can then decide either to have animal services cremate the remains at no cost or arrange for a private cremation.

And best of all, Bill Bruce is willing to share his knowledge and expertise. By sheer serendipity, I have been notified that on Friday, September 30th, ORA-Organization for the Rescue of Animals will be hosting a special event featuring an exciting lecture by Bill Bruce, at 7:00 p.m. in the Intercontinental Hotel’s Portman Room at 220 Bloor Street West. Mr. Bruce will happily provide a wealth of proven examples and information to local animal-caring politicians, pound managers, advocates, veterinarians and anyone willing to participate in actively helping to stop the complacent killing of animals in shelters. Tickets are $11.30 (tax included). Advance sale only. Call 416-726-5762 to purchase. This is an event that the Mayor and all Councillors should try to attend and understand the importance of maintaining TAS with the goal in mind of emulating the Calgary example and turning TAS into a model of animal care and control and a self-funding service.

The City of Montreal tried the implementation of for-profit privatization of animal services at Berger Blanc, with disastrous results.

The City of Montreal has been shocked, internationally shamed and embarrassed by the unmitigated cruelty exposed at Berger Blanc, the rectification of which will surely cost Montreal taxpayers dearly. If you are truly interested, there are videos online of what transpired at Berger Blanc. A warning though, you best have a strong stomach and some kleenex handy.

The Montreal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals states on its website that "the for-profit model of animal control is a model that has failed everywhere it has been tried in North America. This is because for-profit pounds benefit from overpopulation as it serves the profit model of their business (ensuring a constant supply of animals entering the facility ensures a constant source of income). A vital part of any properly-run animal control program is an effort to reduce over population, which the pound for-profit model does not."

For-profit pounds have no animal welfare mission, no mandate for the protection of animals and few, if any, adoption programs, spay/neuter programs, etc. as they do not add to the bottom line. It is simply cheaper and more economical to kill an animal rather than feed, house, spay/neuter and try to adopt it out. Surely we owe a homeless animal a greater debt and a better future than to be killed simply because at one point in its life, it is unwanted. As Gandhi once famously said "I hold that the more helpless a creature, the more entitled it is to protection by man from the cruelty of man".

Someone, somewhere, will want to give that dog, cat, rabbit, bird, hamster or gerbil, a loving and compassionate home. This is a moral and ethical obligation on our part to the animal. I would not want the responsibility for the deaths of countless animals resting on my shoulders simply because of a bad decision made without sufficient information; I ask how morally comfortable each of you would be with that.

I would also urge the City to give serious consideration to repealing the by-law limiting the number of pets an owner is allowed to have, provided that they are responsible pet owners and provide adequate care. Having more pets than permitted by the current by-law inhibits owners from licensing their animals. Removing the restriction on numbers should generate more revenue for the City and move more animals out of the shelter through adoption.

What sense does it make that the one person with four perfectly behaved toy dogs weighing 6 lbs each is a lawbreaker while the person down the street with the three 80 lb. marauding dogs is in compliance? Common sense and rationale must be in play when by-laws are implemented or they shouldn't exist at all.
I have some easily-implemented suggestions to assist in making TAS self sustaining and self-funded and they are as follows:

• Engage citizens to ask for suggestions to make TAS self-funding. The public is an invaluable source of creative and innovative ideas and, best of all, it is free. No consultant's fee here.

• Both Craigslist and Kijiji advertise hundreds, if not thousands, of backyard and hobby breeders who are selling puppies and kittens on these internet sites.

Companion animals are also sold in flea markets and sometimes even along roadsides. These people, along with puppy/kitten mills and people who refuse to spay or neuter their animals, are major contributors to animal overpopulation and the thousands of animals turned into shelters each year. They breed indiscriminately with no regard to the health or socialization of the animals they are selling. I have seen puppies offered for sale that have not even had their first vaccinations. My suggestion is to make it mandatory to have a breeder's licence issued by the City at a cost of perhaps $500 per year with a much more weighty fine if you are in contravention of this requirement. It is also my suspicion that these people are committing income tax fraud by not declaring the income from the sale of these animals. A mandatory breeder's licence and the requirement to report any income might put an end to some of this type of breeding and the misery it causes. If these irresponsible breeders can be stopped by legislation and strict enforcement, the millions of animals put to death in shelters every year will drop dramatically and we can become a part of the burgeoning "no-kill" revolution.

• Strict enforcement of on-leash by-laws for dogs with stiff penalties for non-compliance.

• Stop City enforcement of breed specific legislation ("BSL") which has been proven to be completely ineffective and has resulted in many innocent dogs being sacrificed without proper evidence supporting the ban. Many more-enlightened jurisdictions are repealing BSL. Calgary has never implemented BSL but has strict enforcement of by-laws with respect to owners of dangerous dogs. The City of Ottawa is not enforcing the provincial BSL and has had no more problems than cities which are enforcing the legislation. Enforcing BSL is fiscally irresponsible and ineffective. This is squandering of resources that could more effectively be directed towards the well-being of animals. It is interesting to note that in Calgary aggressive animal issues are now almost non-existent.

KPMG makes reference to several jurisdictional examples of privatized animal care and control in American cities. These comparisons are irrelevant in that some of these facilities are allowed to implement the use of a mobile spay/neuter facility which is not allowed by the Ontario Veterinary Medical Association in Ontario.
KPMG's mandate did not include the impact of for-profit privatization on the quality of the lives of the animals in shelters nor were they aware of the horrors that have arisen by for-profit privatization of animal care and control in some cities such as Berger Blanc in Montreal.

Rather than risk the same consequences as resulted from the implementation of for-profit animal control services at Berger Blanc, I think an in-depth investigation should precede any decision and the decision making should not rest solely on the suggestions of KPMG. Their mandate did not take into account the results of their suggestions, other than some minimal, possible but unconfirmed savings. I wonder how they, or you, would feel if their or your family pet were picked up by for-profit animal control and killed before there was an opportunity to claim it, as is the sad and sorry practice in many such facilities.

Please note that I do not use the label euthanasia here, as euthanasia is from the Greek for "good death". It is meant to be used by licensed professionals when an animal is suffering greatly from sickness or injury with no hope of recovery. Putting a perfectly healthy, adoptable animal to death because of the bottom line is not euthanasia. "Euthanasia" or "putting an animal to sleep" when used in connection with a viable, adoptable, healthy animal are just convenient euphemisms used to avoid the truth of the situation, which is that it is simply killing.

Dogs have a sense of smell approximately 1,000 times greater than humans and sense impending death in a shelter. Imagine for a moment that someone has a catch pole around your neck from which there is no escape, unmercifully drags you down a hallway to a room where, without any compassion, kindness or sedation they end your life, by a process known as the heart stick. The intracardial/heart stick used on an unsedated animal is considered in the veterinary and euthanasia community to be a deplorable "technique", entirely unacceptable and inhumane which delivers a brutal and excruciatingly painful death to an animal. This is the practice of many for-profit shelters simply because it is cost-effective. Animals in shelters are living, breathing beings that are deserving of protection and compassion.
When using a for-profit organization to provide animal control services, these are some of the points that must be considered:

1. How much liability insurance will you require the contractor to carry? Most act as an “agent” for the government entity, and thus the City is still legally responsible for actions of the contractor.

2. What enforcement powers would the City grant to the contractor? Will the contractor be aggressive at enforcing your laws?

3. What type of audit procedures is the City allowed to place upon the contractor to keep track of the taxpayers' money?

4. Will this contractor offer minimum and continuing training standards for its entire staff? Will it conduct a criminal check with respect to prospective employees?

5. Will the contractor have a veterinarian on staff?

6. Will the contractor provide adequate sheltering facilities for the care and housing of impounded or surrendered animals?

7. Will the City rent its current shelter facilities to a contractor or would a contractor be required to provide its own facilities? If the latter, what would happen to the current shelter facilities and staff?

8. Will the City's contractor be required to provide and maintain proper equipment and vehicles to ensure animal and human safety?

9. Will the contractor be required promote a positive image within the community?

10. Now ask yourself one very important question: Will the contractor meet or exceed the same level of services you would expect from the City's operations?

Any private contractor must at least maintain the same standards of animal care that are currently in place and must be held to the same, and possibly higher, standards of openness and accountability to the City Council and the public. This accountability and transparency should be mandatory for any private operator.

The University of Tennessee produced a report dated March 7, 2011 outlining some of the pitfalls of privatization stating that it is not a cure for every municipal ailment, that it has it own unique problems, some of which can be quite serious.

The problems, briefly summarized, are: (i) the incentive to cut corners; (ii) failure to consider the attendant costs of privatization which always exceeds the amount specified in the city's contract with the private provider and which may exceed the cost of the existing service despite the contractor's fee being less; (iii) corruption; (iv) employee resistance; (v) loss of interdepartmental cooperation; (vi) interference in the development of the contract; (vii) failure to manage the contract; (viii) dependence and contract renewal and, most importantly, (ix) surprises – in an effort to submit the lowest bid, contractors may lowball and once the contract has been awarded to them, may seek amendments that result in higher-than-expected costs to the city.

Toronto can either be on the leading edge of animal care and control or not. It will not promote the image of Toronto as a world-class city if the dirty little secret comes to light that animals are being tortured and killed in the most inhumane manner all due to a lack of foresight and investigation by the City prior to implementing the suggestions contained in the CSR.

Pets of any kind bring unmeasured enrichment and companionship to peoples' lives, especially the elderly and bedridden as evidenced by the positive impact on the lives of patients by the placement of resident cats in long-term care facilities.
A study published by the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology shows that the benefits of having a canine or feline companion are real and broad and after having conducted extensive research, the Journal concluded that pet owners are less likely to die within one year of having a heart attack than those that did not own an animal. The study showed that pet owners tended to be less lonely, have higher self-esteem, get more exercise, be more extroverted and were less fearful about getting close to other people. It has long been recognized by both educational and medical communities that pairing dogs with people for therapeutic reasons has positive benefits.

Add to this the benefits derived from rescued shelter dogs which are now working as police enforcement, drug, explosives and banned cell phone detection officers; therapy dogs calming autistic children or those with Asperger's Syndrome; sight, hearing and seizure alert dogs; search and rescue and cadaver detection; those providing a non-judgmental audience for children with shyness or developmental issues to read to; cancer detection; companionship for Alzheimer's patients and those suffering from dementia; lowering blood pressure; comforting the ailing and helping special witnesses testify in court.

This study also establishes that there are many positive consequences for everyday people who own pets. As society's understanding of the psychological processes underlying perceptions of pets grows, the present work provides valuable insights for the meaningful social support that pets provide for their owners and the attendant benefits these ubiquitous and consequential relationships generate. What we get in return for our alliance with animals is perhaps much greater than what we put in. We should be vigorously promoting adoption and pet ownership, not contemplating implementing for-profit privatization which will undoubtedly result in the deaths of many, many animals that could have brought much needed joy and assistance into the lives of needy people.

Recent research reveals the science behind the remarkable bond between humans and their dogs and investigates new discoveries in genetics that are illuminating the origin of dogs—with surprising implications for the evolution of human culture.
Further research is proving dogs have an uncanny ability to read and respond to human emotions. Humans, in turn, respond to dogs with the same hormone responsible for bonding mothers to their babies.

Interestingly, Cesar Milan, the well-renowned dog behaviourist, states that, "researchers are just starting to discover what dogs are capable of - an expansive vocabulary, social intelligence not found in other animals, and abstract thinking at the level of a two-year-old human child. Some dogs are proving to be more intelligent than anyone ever thought possible."

We have an intricate, extraordinary and interactive relationship with dogs. For decades science has dismissed dogs as being unworthy of legitimate study. It is now a school of thought that without the domestication of dogs, civilization would not have been possible as they were pivotal in the change from hunter/gatherers to agriculturists and that they may in fact be more intelligent than even our closest relatives, the great apes.

University of Lincoln Professor Daniel Mills, using state-of-the-art technology, is investigating just how close our relationship with dogs is and looks into the scientific basis for dogs to read our emotions. According to his studies, the right side of our face more clearly represents our emotional state and that is why, when presented with a human face, we tend to look at the left side of the face of the person we are facing (i.e. their right side). This is known as a "right side bias". Through tracking software, Professor Mills made the remarkable discovery that dogs show the same preference when shown a human face. No other animal has this relationship with the human face and dogs don't do it with each other.

Additionally, Dr. Adam Miklosi had conducted studies at the Eötvös Loránd University in Hungary demonstrating that dog barks are indeed a language and that humans do have the ability to understand that language. Also, Dr. Juliane Kaminski, a cognitive psychologist at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, is conducting studies that compare the abilities of chimpanzees versus dogs to follow human direction (such as pointing) with the dogs clearly the winners. This is perhaps what makes them invaluable as law enforcement, service and therapy animals.

But dogs' greatest gift is yet to come. Dr. Elinor Karlsson, a geneticist at the Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, is conducting studies on dog DNA through simple blood collection to discover gene mutations that could lead to cures for some of the most dangerous diseases of our time which are shared by dogs and humans such as diabetes, cardiac diseases, epilepsy and bone/breast/brain cancers. Dr. Karlsson was part of the team that in 2005 mapped all 2.4 billion letters of the dog genome sequence. Identifying a gene in dogs that causes disease allows researchers to locate the corresponding gene in humans and find a cure. What more can we possibly ask from them?

I included the above information on research into the intelligence of dogs as I want to emphasize that shelters are dealing with sentient beings with a range of emotions and able to tune into our emotions as no other animal can or has.
Perhaps for these ongoing contributions over the last 12 or 13 thousand years and future contributions, we owe them a greater debt and respect than our current treatment of them.

If you are still reading, I congratulate you on your stamina and thank you for your indulgence, patience and interest. This is an extremely important topic for me as the animals are voiceless and powerless with respect to their fates and futures and we must speak out on their behalf. Privatization is not the answer to every municipality's budget problems and I understand full well that the City is attempting to make an effort to introduce market economics into the provision of programs and services that have traditionally been provided by the government. We need to bear in mind however, that while some services lend themselves to privatization, that is not the case with animal care and control.

If there is any further information I can provide or should you wish to contact me to discuss any issues or suggestions in this letter, my contact information is set out above and I would be more than pleased to do anything in my power to assist.





-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A request

The reason for this blog is to help get specific dogs adopted from TAS but equally important is to try to normalize the idea of shelter dogs being just as good and just as desirable as any other dogs including those which are regularly merchandised by backyard breeders, puppy millers and those few remaining pet store owners who still feel a need to sell live animals. The single greatest stigma shelter animals still face is the belief that shelter animals are substandard animals. Anyone who has had enough experience with shelter animals knows this is untrue but the general public hasn't had the same experiences you've had. They see a nice dog photo in a glossy magazine and too many of them would never think of associating that dog with a dog from a shelter. After all, no one abandons perfectly good dogs, right? Unfortunately, as we all know, perfectly good dogs are abandoned all the time.

The public still too often associates shelter dogs with images of beat up, sick, dirty, severely traumatized animals and while we definitely sometimes see victims such as these, they are certainly not the majority and, regardless, even the most abused animals can very often be saved and made whole again.

Pound Dogs sometimes discusses the sad histories some of the dogs have suffered. For the most part, though, it tries to present the dogs not as victims but as great potential family members. The goal is to raise the profiles of animals in adoption centers so that a potential pet owner sees them as the best choice, not just as the charity choice.

So, here's the favour I'm asking. Whenever you see a dog picture on these pages you think is decent enough, I'd like you to consider sharing it on Facebook or any other social media sites you're using (I know many of you do this already and thank you for that). And when you share it, please mention that the dog in the photo is a shelter dog like so many other shelter dogs waiting for a home. If we can get even five percent of the pet buying public to see shelter dogs differently, to see how beautiful they are and how wonderful they are, and to consider shelter dogs as their first choice for a new family member, we can end the suffering of homeless pets in this country.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------